|
|
|
|
|
|
|
backline.
we had this conversation before round one. i think we have a clearer idea of our top six backliners now. bower, thornton (injured), jamison (injured) walker (still injured), waite (suspended), grigg. so this weekend will be the biggest test of all. in three weeks time we might see the full group of guys playin together. look out for the end of the year guys and girls. we have yet to experience our best. is anyone gettin a bit excited about the prospect of an awesome backline.?
By Ryan from Hobart (Blues supporter), 28 May 2008 10:38
Viewed 206 times
|
Chris from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 9 Jun 2008 19:43
hide comment
Carltons 95 premiership side had such a good backline of silvagni, christou, sexton mckay, Hogg and Hanna. Such an awesome backline. I think The blues of today are developing a backline very similar. When u look at Thornton, Jamison, Walker, Waite and Bower thats a fair backline but they need some smaller quick type players in there like a Carrazzo or Scotland and even a Gibbs every now and then to match up on the opposition goalsneak. O'Hailpin, Austin and even Anderson and Benjamin are all likely types who can play down back also. So there are some great signs there already for another awesome defence which will bring our 17th flag in the very near future.
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 10:46
hide comment
The Blues backline is still severly lacking i.e. bottom 3 in the comp. We still need a top quality big to take the gorilla forwards, a specialist small Back Pocket for your Milne, Farmer, Hooper types and an accountable CHB. With time Jamo and Bower look like becoming very good, Thornton will continue to take the oppositions 3rd forward and our half backs are interchangable. Hopefully our dearth of talented key-position defenders will be addressed in this years draft or trade period. To rate Thornton as a great player or a star is to accept mediocrity. He is the player who will take the 3rd best opposition forward every week and provide very little rebound from our defensive 50, that's it.
3 replies
hide replies
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 14:34
hide comment
I can't agree with you. The battle between Carlton and Hawthorn over Thornton confirms my thoughts, and the thoughts of those below, that he is a star. I also don't agree that we're bottom three in the comp for backlines, nor that we need to recruit more key defenders this year. I'd rather see them recruit forwards. In fact, I was of the opinion during last year's trade period that we should have traded Walker to the Eagles instead of Kennedy, and the efforts up forward this year have done nothing to change my mind on that. I do agree with you, however, that our ability to finally apply midfield pressure has had the biggest impact - and the Collingwood game was the start of it. It was marvellous to see our defenders smash the Collingwood forwards after the assisting kicks were hurried, while Fevola smashed Harry O'Brien (who I believe played a reasonable game) because the assisting kicks to him were unpressured.
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 14:55
hide comment
A few points; Hawthorn offered pick 24 & 33 for this so called star (they obviosly didn't think TOO highly of him) and the Blues wanted more, would you like to reconsider your point? Who, besides Melbourne and maybe Essendon have a worse backline than the Blues? The Eagles didn't want Walker and the Blues were not prepared to trade him. Walker hasn't played this year due to his AC injury and Kennedy has played a handfull of games and been 'handy' at best in these games. Walker has more runs on the board. I think the dust is yet to settle on the Judd trade so lets talk about it at the end of the year. Did you notice the void left in the defence last week due to the suspension of Waite? We have no key position depth in our backline and this should be addressed in the draft. You're right, the Blues do need a second forward target. I believe the club is already looking at Roughhead, McKinley and Pavlich for next season plus have their eyes on Hurley in the upcoming draft.
1 reply
hide reply
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 13:18
hide comment
In the modern era, two 2nd-round draft picks is a very big offer. I believe St Kilda has a worse backline than us. Runs on the board when talking about a second-year ruckman or key position player mean nothing. Bigger players take three-to-four years to come good. Hawthorn's intelligence to recruit all of their key players first and midfielders second is the reason why they're such a power now. You can't talk just about the void left by Waite's suspension when we were dogged by the respective absences of Jamison, and to a lesser extent Bannister and (for half the game) Bower - and it's not as if Waite has been the best-performed defender this season.
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 13:27
hide comment
Do you actually watch football? Waite made the Victorian Side as a centre half back...who exactly do you think has played better in defence than Waite for the Blues this year?!?!
1 reply
hide reply
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 13:31
hide comment
Jamison continues to be the most effective defensive player. Now, I'll admit that Waite hasn't been helped by having tougher match-ups, but he's struggled of late. Kennedy smashed him, as did Jonathon Brown, on whom Setanta did a better job.
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 13:59
hide comment
Define effective...Almost 80% of our run from defence is coming from Waite, he is so often the 3rd man to a contest or cutting across the line of the leading Full Forwards. I also believe he is leading the league in effective spoils. Jamieson is becoming the miserly defender we have been screaming for but really, has only played a handful of games and is still just a rookie. No offence, but I would take the opinion of the Victorian selctors over yours and he made the team.
1 reply
hide reply
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 6 Jun 2008 12:42
hide comment
I define "effective defensive" under the role of the traditional defender - stopping his opponent from getting marks and scores. Thus I do not count rebounding in my definition, hence our disagreement.
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 9 Jun 2008 14:06
hide comment
I travelled to Adelaide for the Port game and saw things first hand. Thornton is an average at best defender. He was comprehensively beaten in defence through lack of pace, awareness and positioning, especially away from the ball. Possibly our worst defender tonight. If you think otherwise, you obviously lack the pride and 'arrogance' that made this club so great in the 70's and 80's.
1 reply
hide reply
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 9 Jun 2008 14:28
hide comment
I stayed in Melbourne and watched it on television, and I agree that he was clearly the worst-performed defender on the night. But comprehensively beaten? I think not. Motlop managed one goal and seven touches for the night, and I'm pretty sure Carrazzo was still on Gray when Gray scored his only goal, so to say that he was comprehensively beaten is a lie. But points for the backline: Setanta is not one of our regular top six, but he was admirable. Clearly beat Westhoff, who was damaging only in the third when Waite was on him. This means that not only do we have a decent backline, but we have depth in it. Meanwhile, our ineptitude in the first three quarters trying to get the ball forward must surely show you that the lack of options in the forward-line is where we must be looking to recruit in the future - and where we should be developing Kreuzer into a Kennedy-replacement Koschitzke-type player.
Adrian from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 17:12
hide comment
You say thorton takes the third best foward and provides very little tun. You couldnt be further from the truth. He was on Steve Johson all game last week and although he got beaten the coach trusted him to win. For the last 5 years he was been given jobs on far better and bigger players than him as we had nobody better. We have bigger and better players now so he can be let loose on the 3rd foward. He killes them and then creates alot of run off them. If you ask me before he got injured he was top 3 in the bnf. Hes a medium sized player than had midfielder abilities and can play taller than himself. Hes the most experianced player down back and he provides alot of leadership to young stars in the making like Bower and Jamo (Jamo might already be a star hes so good). We dont need to draft any more defenders as we have Austin playing in the twos who is a quality player. What we need to do it develope what we have into a power house defence which i believe we have the persoal already to do.
2 replies
hide replies
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 18:05
hide comment
Jamieson will take the number 1 full forward every week. Waite the key position Half Back. Bower looks like he now takes the next best (started on Pavlich v Freo then Tarrant, went to Travis Cloke v Collingwood). Setanta helps out on the Monsters (J. Brown's). Thornton gets whatever is left over i.e. most experienced defender gets the weaker opponent. You may have even seen him used up forward in the NAB cup and start of the year.These are facts, and the way the team lines up every week. Thornton does carry the ball, some may say for a little too long as he often ignores upfield leads as he meanders out of defence and often takes that one bounce too many. The real run comes from Scotland, Carrazzo, Walker (when fit), Bower and Waite not Thornton. How could you have Thornton in the top 3 of the B&F with players like; Judd Murphy Fevola Stevo Waite all having very good years?? Also, not so sure how well you know the team but Austin is a loooooooong way away from being a regular decent AFL footballer. He was drafted bottom age and has plenty of filling out to do. We all know the young talls take longer to develope so give him time. His form in the Bullants has been ok at best this year. I hope they do give him a game this week though with Bower to miss the next 8-10.
2 replies
hide replies
Adrian from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 19:10
hide comment
When Thorton got injured Judd and Stevo hadnt started to play well, they were injured and not getting as much time on the ground as they are not. I must say im happy your not on the carlton decition making team. Have you watched any football in the last 5 years or do you only turn up now when we have been competitive. Thorton has been the only good defender in this team for along time. We drafted Luke Livinston with pick 4 a couple of years ago and he was a dud. Ive seen games were Thorton played on the likes of Barry Hall and beats them. Hes shorter and lighter but he still gives a great contest. Ovcorse hes not gonna get the number one option anymore when we have bigger options that will be able to stand up for longer against the better players aswell as being younger and given the boys some experiance so they can dominate when we are runnig for the flag. Also i do know quite a bit about the team and i know that the coaching staff are liking Austin as a future regular. If you read whatever Teague the bullants coach has to say he says that Austin is improving every game and he might get a game later on in the year. The beauty about him being a project is that we are not going for the flag now and when hes ready for senior selection we will be going for the flag but untly then im willing to wait.
Bradley from Bendigo (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 12:06
hide comment
I agree with what you said re 3rd bf the rest are above bar JARRED WAITE he has and is disappointing..disposal crap decision making crap.. promises heaps and has promised heaps and still not there yet.. NEEDS TO BE AT CENTRE HALF FORWARD.. he can just do his thing up there without thinking to much , and he will also be hard to man up which in turn will free up fev and fisher.
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 13:11
hide comment
I thought Bower was on Johnson until his injury.
Bradley from Bendigo (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 12:01
hide comment
i think as supporters we are all frustrated and pissed off that the blues have taken so long to re - develop and sides like lions,swans,crows and port can rebuild so quickly. ALL I WANT NOW IS TO BE COMPETITIVE WITH WHAT WE HAVE and that is a very young,not big and strong enough yet to deal with the big hard hitting sides. Our backline at the moment if it was able to play together would be (backs - THORNTON JAMIESON O'HAILPIN half backs - WALKER BOWER GRIGG ,GIBBS OR SCOTLAND..also cloke can drop back to help out defense .WAITE needs to play up forward and put some pressure on the other sides defense and take some pressure of fev each week. WAITES disposal and decision making under pressure out of the backline shows HE IS A FORWARD... carazzo gets the ball heaps but doesnt flippin stay on his man on the rebound..TOO LOOSE..
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 5 Jun 2008 12:18
hide comment
I don't think many people can fully comprehend the effect the draft penalties had on the Blues.
Mal from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 20:47
hide comment
Waite should be playing CHF as he has probably given away more goals than anyone in our backs. Through lack of discipline and not playing tight. Setanta actually plays role better as he is tighter but needs to put more body pressure when ball is in the air. I wouldn't mind seeing Cloke strip 3-4 kgs off and give CHB a crack. To say Thornton is a star is laughable. He is handy. Stars are G. Ablett, J Brown, C Judd not B Thornton. Our backs are gettin better but lets not go overboard
Michael from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 1 Jun 2008 23:59
hide comment
I think it is fair to say that the Blues were naive not to let Thornton go when they had a chance to snare someone better. I personally think his days at the club are numbered, but the blokes who decide who we get at draft time need to have a good hard look at what they keep ignoring... premier backmen. We don't need rucks (Kruzer, Cloke, Hampson) we don't need mids (Judd, Scotland, Stevens) and we certainly don't need a great deal of forwards (Betts, Fevola, Wiggins, Fisher). I dunno. It seems we just keep overlooking our smallish, under-performing and lazy backline. Jamison is exciting, Waite is dominant and guys like Carrazo are awesome when they slip back. But i watched them last night and they were nothing short of aweful. Any team like ours can score well, but our backline is sloppy and takes too long to work out what it wants to do and won't crash the lines. When they did last night, we scored. Simple.
2 replies
hide replies
Ryan from Hobart (Blues supporter), 2 Jun 2008 10:03
hide comment
understandable, but the weekend (again) was proof that our team are to slow and don't think before they act. it easy to just blaze away with the football and bomb it forward. i was doing that in primary school. these blokes are fiddling about with the football. and bower found out the hard way what happends when u take to long to dispose of the footy. no one talks to each other. all his team mates just let him get smashed. everyone is worriesd about number one. everytime someone got the ball i was waiting for them to get smashed. no shepards, soft soft soft..... oh and its funny how judd was best on ground for us. obviously his brain is switched onto the level that geelong play at cause he could actually read the bloody play! long way to go guys before we see the boys win a premiership. stevens is still a bit soft cause of his neck injury last year. and the moment these boys play as a group and run lines together we might see somethin good. not all is lost but lots of work is needed to make this team the great old dark navy blue again.
1 reply
hide reply
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 14:37
hide comment
yeah, long way to go. But we have a new coach and the youngest team in the league, and I like the things they are doing. They're gaining confidence and experience in their run and carry, and getting better in the support play. The well-oiled Geelong machine cannot come without years of building towards it, and so long as they make errors while trying to do the right things, I'm happy.
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 15:01
hide comment
True, the Blues need to grow as a unit organically just as Geelong and Hawks have done. We adopted the youth policy at just the right time as the draft looks like being raped by the 17th and 18th AFL teams in the coming years. I think there are still a few key area's that we struggle and need to be addressed come draft time, but we should be on our way by next year.
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 2 Jun 2008 13:15
hide comment
You're wrong. Thornton was definitely off his game against Geelong, there's no doubting that, but he is our #3 defender and does a good job of it. Furthermore, in Jamison, Waite, Bower and Thornton, there is the makings of a premier backline. The problem against Geelong was that they are so effective at rebounding that the defenders were always caught one-on-one. It is a fact that defending against turnovers and rebounds is harder because there is no midfield pressure from that sort of play. It is, in fact, our forward-line which is thin. We lack a legitimate #2 forward, and if you believe that any of Betts, Wiggins and Fisher can fill that role in a premiership team, you're deluded. Wiggins could be a great #4 forward, but not #2. Fisher is so cold at the moment that he'd be dropped if we had someone to replace him with. Edwards still has a long way to go. Hartlett, unfortunately, injures his hamstrings every few games, and it's hard to be optimistic about his longevity. In the original plan, our #2 forward was going to be Josh Kennedy - and losing him was the price we were going to have to pay for Chris Judd. What we need to do is play Kreuzer as a Koschitzke type. We'll be able to find a two-pronged ruck attack from Cloke, Hampson, Aisake and Jacobs, but we need forwards.
1 reply
hide reply
Michael from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 3 Jun 2008 1:56
hide comment
fair enough. You make a strong argument and i liked what you had to say, but i still believe Thornton is lucky to be there. I tell you, that mark that Cloke took on the weekend was sensational. If he keeps up the workrate that he did in that game, we'll be better for it. I can't wait for Waite to return (no pun intended) as he will bring the strength back. I aggree with the Koschitske argument. But someone who can also float backwards aswell. Guys, we still have heaps of holes. I guess my question would be, that if you could select any backman from the league to come and play at Carlton, who would it be and why, and who would you give up for it?
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 29 May 2008 12:56
hide comment
People scoffed at me when I rated our backline. Permission to look smug?
1 reply
hide reply
Giuliano from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 4 Jun 2008 11:06
hide comment
Long way to go mate. Our best defenders Bower and Jamieson are undersized (need time in the gym) and inexperienced. Our 3rd best, Thornton, is too small to take the gun full forwards and too slow to take the pacey medium sized. Setanta still doesn't seem to understand the game 100% and his performances are littered with turnovers and clangers. Waite is a CHF playing down back, his field kicking out of defence has been terrible and at times costly and he has zero accountability at other times. Austin hasn't been playing particularly well for the Bullants this year and looks like he will need another season or two before he is right to go. Armfiled looks like a real find and the return of Walker will be important. I think the defensive side of our midfield is what has improved most, a testament to Ratten's new gameplan no doubt. This has made the job of our defenders a whole lot easier as the ball isn't going down back as quickly, freely or as often. However, to say our backline at the moment is anything more than "promosing" would be overrating it in my opinion.
Adrian from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 3 Jun 2008 20:44
hide comment
Thortons a star. For the first five years of his career he has been the number one defender in the team. He would get the number one option and if he didnt win he'd do a good job no matter who he was playing against. This year he has been freed up and has been able to run of his man and creat rebound from 50's which is very important. Before his injury he was almost leading the bnf in my view. With Kruezer ive heard alot of view of where he should play. I feel that he can be as good a ruckman around the ground as cox is for west coast. He is a bit short so he might not win so many hit outs as Hampson will but hes so athletic that he can run around the ground and get midfielder type possetions. A goal or more a game will also help. Putting him down back to run with a man all game is a complete waste of his talent. He needs to be hurting teams not stopping them. If we have learned anything form the past priemers its that defencive teams like Adeliade dont win priemerships.
Andrew from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 3 Jun 2008 19:33
hide comment
Thornton is a great Player. He has been a key down back for a team that has had alot of pressure on its defence. Even against the Cats he was getting high disposals out of defence.....having said that, when the blues were flying in the 90's...particularly 95 we had an all class backline with a full back of the century. It's a hard act to follow.... give him a break indeed.
Bradley from Bendigo (Blues supporter), 3 Jun 2008 9:29
hide comment
I would also like to add the the harsh critiscism of thornton is unwarranted. Before he got injured he was one of our best against west coast and was starting to find his feet and against geelong 1st game back with an already depleted backline he and bower were always gunna look second rate due to geelong getting the ball in so quick and good. GIVE THORNTON a break he's ok
Bradley from Bendigo (Blues supporter), 3 Jun 2008 9:26
hide comment
I agree. A lot of our supporters are knocking our backline and that's fine BUT we havn't had the whole of them playing together all year. BOWER,JAMIESON,THORNTON,WALKER,GRIGG,BANNISTER(backup),WAITE ( is better at centre half forward) , Im thinking kruezer to centre half back next year and beyond. he is quick enough and smart enough just needs to develop his body.
Tarrant from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 31 May 2008 15:08
hide comment
Yeah, I'm surprised they haven't given Austin a chance yet. His time will come, though.
Adrian from Melbourne (Blues supporter), 29 May 2008 22:25
hide comment
great to see the T-bird back. We need his run aswell as his defencive skills. This week will be hard but if we aply alot of midfield pressure the inside 50's we be poor and it will take alot of pressure off the back six. Also i feel that we should play Austin. Hes looking like a good defender in the 2's and as we are a bit thin this week he could help.
Aaron from Perth (Blues supporter), 29 May 2008 16:22
hide comment
When they all come back. Permission will be granted.
Ben from Sydney (Blues supporter), 28 May 2008 20:06
hide comment
i wouldnt mind seeing stevens or scotland on the halfback line also! but yeh its getting pretty strong!
Disclaimer: The comments above were added by Facebook AFL club supporters and do not reflect the opinions of Footywire.com.
|
|
|