Stick to the argument. Don't get all 'guy' on me and start with the labelling (hot-head??). That's about as far away as you could get in a description of me. I am being very measured here and am simply pointing out the deficencies in your argument. Yes we all have opinions Scott. I just don't think you should base your opinion on assumptions. You should base it on facts. "Didak knew about Chris Hudson's involvement with the HA" Is that your assumption or is that fact? Nobody except Didak knows whether or not he knew Hudson before he met him at Spearmint Rhino. Obviously Hudson was a violent thug - he murdered two people. No study required there. Just because someone's a bikie and bikie gangs are often involved in distributing drugs doesn't mean that that someone is definitely involved in drug 'activity'. That's like saying there's a lot of violence against Indian students in Melbourne therefore anyone from Melbourne must be involved in violence towards Indian students. False logic.
You never explicitly said Stokes knows cocaine importers but you implied it. You can't assume that anyone who's bought a gram of coke knows anyone involved other than the person who they bought it off.
Do you honestly think I was presuming that you thought Stokes knew a drug importer who imported 1g of coke for him?? Drugs are imported into the country by all sorts of people, some of whom you could call 'underworld criminals', true, but once again that doesn't necessarily mean all drug purchases can be traced back to 'underworld criminals'. It also doesn't mean that anyone who buys any amount of drugs more than likely knows someone involved in their importation. I buy lots of imported goods. We all do. I don't know who imports them unless the company name is written on the packet and even then I don't know them personally.
Drug money is not laundered through night clubs. Nightclubs don't make anywhere near enough money to be able to pass off drug income as nightclub profits, nor is it likely that anyone is going to invest millions of dollars in a nightclub in order to make money. Gambling is where money is laundered. What this has to do with the idea that Stokes more than likely knows someone involved in major distribution of drugs is beyond me but I though I'd clear that up for you anyway.
Finally, I'm not 'twisting' your words. I'm pointing out the deficencies in your argument. That's what forums like this are for - communicating. It's nothing personal and whatever you do, don't compare me to Guy. I would never resort to personal attacks (maybe if greg from perth returns) or argue for or against anything based on the colours of a football jumper.
And don't take long posts as a sign of 'hot headedness'. I like writing. I like forming a valid argument. I can assure you I'm not thumping the keyboard in some sort of fury or stomping around the room in between typing sentences.
Stokes bought 1g of cocaine. That's it.
Have fun.