AFL Statistics Home
AFL Fixture »
Players »
Teams »
Player Rankings »
Team Rankings »
Rising Stars »
AFL Draft »
Brownlow Medal »
AFL Ladder »
Attendances »
Dream Team »
Supercoach »
Records
 
 
Discussion Forums
AFL News
Footy on Facebook
 
Let Kerr Leave?
Im a huge Daniel Kerr but I saw this article in the age and it got me thinking. This is quite long.

CONSIDERING the exits of Chris Judd and Ben Cousins have reduced their three midfield tenors to one, West Coast should seriously consider letting the surviving soloist, Daniel Kerr, lend his voice to another troupe.

They shouldn't sell him to change the club's player culture, or to weed out the badly behaved. Indiscretions of Kerr's recent past are not the reason the Eagles should contemplate a second blockbuster â€" "The Kerr Dismissal" â€" on the heels of "The Judd Defection".

Whereas Judd was uncontracted and went home against their wishes, the Eagles are in a position to control a Kerr trade, subject to his agreement. Contrary to misinformed speculation, Kerr is contracted for 2009. This is significant, for it gives the Eagles the whip hand in any negotiations with another club. They don't have to trade unless the deal is right.

Two first-round draft picks ought to be the minimum. I'd be surprised if they couldn't obtain a very high return from a Melbourne club and the industry talk has long been that Kerr is amenable to a shift in the right circumstances (read the right club and contract).

Moreover, if Kerr really is interested in a move east, better to trade him while he's contracted than when he's not.

St Kilda, Collingwood and Hawthorn would be the ideal clubs for Kerr in the event he leaves. Carlton might be thrown in the mix, simply because of Kerr's friendship with Judd, but it's questionable whether the Blues, with a younger profile, tick the demographic boxes.

The suggestion that Kerr be sold after Judd and Cousins have gone might strike some as absurd â€" why weaken a declining empire further?

Actually, the decline and fall of the empire is precisely why Kerr represents such a unique opportunity for the Eagles: He's a blue-chip asset that can land them the draft picks they need to launch another crack at a flag.

Kerr turns 25 next month and should have at least three years of high-voltage football left. West Coast is in the throes of a rebuild. The club is sober and realistic about where it stands, which right now, is in the bottom four.

The draft system doesn't allow a hegemony, not even for a West Aussie club as resource-rich as the Pilbara. Having been gutted by the loss of Judd and Cousins, the Eagles have less to lose by losing Kerr, because he won't be the difference between winning and losing a flag over the next few years.

Why not relocate resources from the grim present to the rosier future, post 2010, when the four players from inside the draft's top 22 the club recruited in 2007 (three of them part of the Judd compensation) will be entering their prime years?

Kerr's prime years are worth more to a contending team than the rebuilding Eagles over the next few years.

Another relevant subplot: some of the draft's best and brightest prospects are West Australian teens.

There also is a cloud on the horizon that the Eagles should bear in mind: the upheaval caused by the new Gold Coast team. The introduction of the Gold Coast, followed by Western Sydney, will be a severe drain on the talent pool in 2009, 2010 and beyond. Indeed, 2010, will not be a good year to be in the ladder's lower reaches, given that the AFL's new Queensland pet will have the lions' share, so to speak, of the early picks. Better to be proactive and replenish the weakened playing stocks now rather than in 2010, when the market will be crowded with clubs desperately trying to offload Fred the half-back flanker for a hand in the draft.

Let's consider the prospective suitors for Kerr. St Kilda has class in the midfield, but little zip. Kerr fixes that hole.

Hawthorn, also with more midfield turtles than hares, would be nearly complete with Kerr, though, given the prospective pay packets of Buddy Franklin and Luke Hodge, it wouldn't find it easy to accommodate Kerr's salary of $600,000 or more.

Collingwood ticks many boxes, except that it has a vexed history of dealing with Michael Malthouse's old club. Essendon was in the market for Judd, and still lacks a major midfield weapon. Other clubs, doubtless, would have their hand up. Judd and Kerr were leading men in West Coast's third premiership. They can be instrumental in the fourth flag if West Coast is brave enough to seize, not the day, but the future.

By Baxter from Perth (Eagles supporter), 24 Apr 2008 21:33
  Viewed 161 times  
To add or reply to comments on this topic, please add the Facebook AFL Footy application.
Leanne from Perth (Eagles supporter), 25 Apr 2008 19:19 hide comment
I read the article too, makes perfectly good sense to me, even though I love Kerry. However, if the Eagles r keen to get Rich (and I mean Daniel Rich, from Subi), then I'm afraid they'll have to trade for the #1 pick, and that might mean Kerr. Until I read the article, I thought, nooooo, but now I'm starting to see the positives, and we r rebuilding already as it is, why not step it up a notch, particularly if Kerr does want to leave, if he doesnt, well great, we'll keep him!!
1 reply hide reply
Simon from Melbourne (Eagles supporter), 3 Jul 2008 18:33 hide comment
i agree totally, at least that way we would have more power over the move, not like judd where we were bent over and had no choice, strike now while the iron is hot i say
Callum from Perth (Eagles supporter), 25 Jun 2008 18:01 hide comment
no matter how bad the team is you can't just just constantly get rookies then pretty much all the squad will be 21 or so and under. We can still get enough young talent with the picks we are allocated the way we a going i think. Kerr is a champion who we definitely should build the midfield around as some others have said.
Baxter from Perth (Eagles supporter), 23 Jun 2008 23:50 hide comment
Very mixed opinions on this. Im happy with that.

I knda agree with the people that are saying that we should build a midfield around him like when cousins was the only decent midfielder.

Sandra from Perth (Eagles supporter), 21 Jun 2008 1:24 hide comment
Why should we get rid of one of our best players? I don't think so.....
Chris from Perth (Eagles supporter), 18 Jun 2008 11:15 hide comment
agree 100%. as much as i love what he has done for the club next year's draft is possibly the most important in eagles history and we need at least three high picks to continue the rebuilding process, i look forward to seeing the young fellas develop in the afl rather than the wafl. we have a new breed of midfield on the way with ebert, houlihan, masten and co being led by priddis, stenglein and cox. imagine if we could snag rich and that young fijian kid.
Justin from Perth (Eagles supporter), 6 Jun 2008 16:21 hide comment
yeah good point, to be honest he needs better midfield players around him to actually get the ball,cant do it all himself..
So it might not be a bad thing for him himself cause all he is gonna do is have to lower his standards at the moment ., get new young players to gel together and create a new eagles side,
We got nothing to lose really.judd,cousins and kerr were the now ablett,corey and bartel,
they rely on eachother and gel.AFL is one of the most team driven games around.
Clinton from Perth (Eagles supporter), 25 May 2008 8:57 hide comment
WCE has probably had enough of him anyway. Be worth a few picks if we traded him.
Martin from Perth (Eagles supporter), 30 Apr 2008 12:54 hide comment
What a load of crock...
1 reply hide reply
Baxter from Perth (Eagles supporter), 30 Apr 2008 20:31 hide comment
I appreciate your opinion but this was never something I totally agreed with nor said was fact. All I said was it gives us something to think about if he wanted to leave.
Clinton from Perth (Eagles supporter), 26 Apr 2008 8:09 hide comment
It's Kerr's decision in the end, I hope he stays.
Disclaimer: The comments above were added by Facebook AFL club supporters and do not reflect the opinions of Footywire.com.
Head to Head
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
All Players
Player Search
Compare Players
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
League Averages
League Totals
Rising Star Averages
Rising Star Totals
Season Goalkickers
Team Averages
Team Totals
Opponent Averages
Opponent Totals
Team/Opponent Differential Averages
Team/Opponent Differential Totals
Full AFL Draft History
Draft Summary by Team
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
Rising Star Round by Round Performances
Rising Star Nominees
Rising Star Winners
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
Full Season AFL Fixture
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
Full Season
Round Match Period Location
Venue Stats
Full Brownlow Medal Count
Brownlow Medal Winners
Summary by Team
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
AFL Crowds & Attendances
Blues Bombers Bulldogs
Cats Crows Demons
Dockers Eagles Hawks
Kangaroos Lions Magpies
Power Saints Swans
Tigers
Round by Round Player Rankings
Season Player Rankings
Round by Round Player Rankings
Season Player Rankings